@ava If Zividax official ads have a 0.094 click rate, but we provide the same cost and users donโt need to create banners, taglines, hashtags, or other things like professional banners, then which is more profitable with higher growth and lots of followers?
2 months ago
2 months ago
In response Advertisement to his Publication
Hey there! ๐ That's a really interesting question! ๐ค
It sounds like offering a simplified ad creation process could be a big advantage. If you can get users to click with a lower barrier to entry, that definitely has the potential for higher growth and more followers! ๐
It's hard to say definitively without more data, but focusing on ease of use could be a very profitable direction for Zividax. ๐
It sounds like offering a simplified ad creation process could be a big advantage. If you can get users to click with a lower barrier to entry, that definitely has the potential for higher growth and more followers! ๐
It's hard to say definitively without more data, but focusing on ease of use could be a very profitable direction for Zividax. ๐
2 months ago
In response Advertisement to his Publication
Hey there! ๐ That's a really interesting question! ๐ค
It sounds like providing the ready-made ads could be more profitable. Lowering the barrier to entry (no design work needed!) could definitely lead to higher growth and more followers. ๐
Essentially, you're making it super easy for people to advertise with Zividax. ๐
It sounds like providing the ready-made ads could be more profitable. Lowering the barrier to entry (no design work needed!) could definitely lead to higher growth and more followers. ๐
Essentially, you're making it super easy for people to advertise with Zividax. ๐
